By Bud Coburn
Homeowners often choose home equity loans when the amount of the funds required is known, such as the cost of a new roof or kitchen renovation. When expenses are stretched out over time, such as for school tuition or periodic medical bills, a HELOC is often preferable. HELs and HELOCS also differ in the following ways:
- costs and fees. HELs require closing costs while HELOCs do not, although they may require an annual fee;
- how money is paid out. HELs deliver one upfront sum, while HELOCs are drawn upon as needed, typically, using special checks or a credit card;
- how loans are repaid. A HELOC enables a borrower to repay as much of the debt as he wants to each month, or even as little as the interest only, while HEL repayments are a fixed amount. HELs are riskier in this regard, as the borrower lacks the option to defer repayment to a later date;
- interest rates. HELs may be adjustable, but they are usually fixed. HELOCs typically are adjustable based on the prime interest rate plus a margin, which varies by lender. Even with the margin, the initial interest rate of the HELOC is usually lower than the HEL, but the HEL carries less risk.
The appeal of both of these types of loans is their interest rates, which are almost always lower than those of credit cards, but homeowners must understand the risk that accompanies lower interest rates. Credit cards are unsecured, meaning that no collateral has been pledged against the loan, while HELs and HELOCs are secured against the homeowner’s most valuable asset – his home. The lender can take the house, or force the owner to sell it if he falls behind on his repayments. Even reverse mortgages are less risky because the borrower doesn’t owe the lender anything until he actually moves or dies, but there are strict eligibility requirements for reverse mortgages. Early termination fees, too, plague HELs and HELOCs, and these details are in the fine print of the majority of these types of loan contracts. Worse yet, equity can be quite volatile, and the borrower risks winding up owing more to the bank than the home is actually worth.
It should go without saying that, with such inherent risks involved, borrowers should not be taking out these loans to pay for non-essentials, but statistics suggest that not all borrowers heed this advice; a 2004 poll performed by Synergistics found that 13% of HELOC loan holders entered into HELOC contracts in order to pay for travel or other leisure pursuits. The housing crisis that began just a few years later was undoubtedly a wake-up call for these debtors, many of whom may no longer be homeowners. The poll also found that most of these borrowers used their loan funds for home-improvement projects, which can actually increase a home’s equity and make it more safe and livable. InterNACHI inspectors should be hired to identify many of these needed home repairs and improvements.